Aesthetic judgments and meaning-making during cooking in Home and Consumer Studies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Swedish home and consumer studies (HCS), cooking forms a part of the core content, and students often experience the results in a sensuous way – by eating the food. Sensuous, or aesthetic, experiences may affect students’ meaning-making and thus what is learned within the subject. There is a lack of research concerning the aesthetic aspects of cooking in a learning context; therefore, this study aims to explore HCS students’ meaning-making by focusing on aesthetic judgments during formalized cooking practices. The research question is, in what ways do students use aesthetic judgments in meaning-making processes during cooking? The data comes from video-documented classroom observations where the students cook together. Using a pragmatic approach and practical epistemology analysis (PEA), three ways in which the students use aesthetic judgments are illustrated: as arguments in negotiations, as reference points when reactualizing experiences, and as nonverbal actions evaluating sensory qualities. Empirical examples exemplify how aesthetic judgments play a role in establishing power relations, entail social/normative values, and influence the “tacit knowing” of cooking. The study found that aesthetic experiences are integral and important in students’ meaning-making during cooking practices. Moreover, by adding a new classroom context to the methodology used, its applicability for investigating aesthetic experiences and meaning-making is confirmed and widened.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Andersson, J., & Östman, L. (2015). A transactional way of analysing the learning of ‘tacit knowledge’. Interchange, 46(3), 271-287. doi: 10.1007/s10780-015-9252-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-015-9252-8
Bohm, I., Lindblom, C., Åbacka, G., & Hörnell, A. (2016). ‘Don't give us an assignment where we have to use spinach!’: food choice and discourse in home and consumer studies. International journal of consumer studies, 40(1), 57-65. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12213
Bourdieu, P. (1984/2013). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2005/2017). Taste of Luxury, Taste of Necessity. In C. Korsmeyer (Ed.), The Taste Culture Reader. Experiencing Food and Drink (2. ed., p. 54-59). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Brunosson, A., Brante, G., Sepp, H., & Mattsson Sydner, Y. (2014). To use a recipe–not a piece of cake. Students with mild intellectual disabilities’ use of recipes in home economics. International journal of consumer studies, 38(4), 412-418. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12109
Caraher, M., & Lang, T. (1999). Can't cook, won't cook: A review of cooking skills and their relevance to health promotion. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 37(3), 89-100. doi: 10.1080/14635240.1999.10806104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.1999.10806104
Charters, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2005). Is wine consumption an aesthetic experience? Journal of Wine Research, 16(2), 121-136. doi: 10.1080/09571260500327663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260500327663
Dewey, J. (1929/1984). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. In J. A. Boydson (Ed.), The Later Works (1925-1953) (4. ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1976). Knowing and the Known. Connecticut: Praeger Publishers Inc.
Dickie, G. (1971). Aesthetics: An Introduction. New York: Pegasus.
Fine, G. A. (1985). Occupational aesthetics: how trade school students learn to cook. Urban Life, 14(1), 3-31. doi: 10.1177/0098303985014001001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098303985014001001
Fine, G. A. (1996). Kitchens. The culture of restaurant work. Berkley: University of California Press.
Flewitt, R. (2006). Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: education research assumptions and methodological practies. Visual communication, 5(1), 25-50. doi: 10.1177/1470357206060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206060917
Freeland, C. (2012). Aesthetics and the senses: Introduction. Essays in philosophy, 13(2), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1427
Gisslevik, E., Wernersson, I., & Larsson, C. (2017). Teaching sustainable food consumption in Swedish Home Economics: a case-study. International Journal of Home Economics, 10(2), 52-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051463
Gisslevik, E., Wernersson, I., & Larsson, C. (2018). Pupils’ participation in and response to sustainable food education in swedish home and consumer studies: A case-study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-20. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2017.1415965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1415965
Granberg, A. (2018). Koka sjuda steka. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv på matlagning i hem- och konsumentkunskap på grundsärskolan. (Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala). Retrieved from: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1236617/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Hamza, K. (2010). Contingency in high-school students’ reasoning about electrochemical cells: Opportunities for learning and teaching in school science. (Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm). Retrieved from: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:279988/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Hjälmeskog, K. (2000). “Democracy begins at home”. Utbildning om och för hemmet som medborgarfostran. (Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala). Retrieved from: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:165995/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Hofverberg, H., & Maivorsdotter, N. (2018). Recycling, crafting and learning –An empirical analysis of how students learn with garments and textile refuse in a school remake project. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 775-790. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1338672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1338672
Höijer, K., Fjellström, C., & Hjälmeskog, K. (2013). Learning space for food: exploring three Home Economics classrooms. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(3), 449-469. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2013.809374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2013.809374
Jaffe, J., & Gertler, M. (2006). Victual vicissitudes: Consumer deskilling and the (gendered) transformation of food systems. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(2), 143-162. doi: 10.1007/s10460-005-6098-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6098-1
Janhonen, K., Torkkeli, K., & Mäkelä, J. (2018). Informal learning and food sense in home cooking. Appetite, 130, 190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.019
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P-O. (2008). The Roles of Aesthetic Experience in Elementary School Science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45-65. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
Korsmeyer, C. (2002). Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.
Korsmeyer, C. (2017). Taste and other senses: Reconsidering the foundations of aesthetics. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 26(54). doi: 10.7146/nja.v26i54.103078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v26i54.103078
Lang, T., Caraher, M., Dixon, P., & Carr-Hill, R. (1999). Cooking skills and health. London: Health Education Authority.
Lidar, M., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2010). A pragmatist approach to meaning making in children's discussions about gravity and the shape of the earth. Science Education, 94(4), 689-709. doi: 10.1002/sce.20384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20384
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology. Science education, 90(1), 148-163. doi: 10.1002/sce.20092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20092
Lindblom, C., Erixon Arreman, I., & Hörnell, A. (2013). Practical conditions for Home and Consumer Studies in Swedish compulsory education: a survey study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(5), 556-563. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12027
Lindblom, C., Erixon Arreman, I., Bohm, I., & Hörnell, A. (2016). The importance of time frames in Swedish Home and Consumer Studies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(3), 299-308. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12256
Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2012). Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 255-279. doi: 10.1177%2F1468794112436655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112436655
Maivorsdotter, N. (2012). Idrottsutövandets estetik: en narrativ studie om meningsskapande och lärande. (Doctoral thesis, Örebro University, Örebro). Retrieved from: http://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:458039/FULLTEXT02.pdf
Maivorsdotter, N., & Quennerstedt, M. (2012). The act of running: a practical epistemology analysis of aesthetic experience in sport. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 4(3), 362-381. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2012.693528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2012.693528
National Agency for Education. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare. Revised 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.skolverket.se/sitevision/proxy/publikationer/svid12_5dfee44715d35a5cdfa2899/55935574/wtpub/ws/skolbok/wpubext/trycksak/Blob/pdf3984.pdf?k=3984
National Food Agency. (2015). Mat för alla sinnen. Sensorisk träning enligt SAPERE-metoden. Retrieved from: https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/globalassets/publikationsdatabas/broschyrer/sapere_livsmedelsverket_a4-mindre.pdf
Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., Perry, C., & Casey, M. A. (1999). Factors influencing food choices of adolescents: findings from focus-group discussions with adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(8), 929-937. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00222-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00222-9
Piqueras, J., Hamza, K. M., & Edvall, S. (2008). The practical epistemologies in the museum: A study of students' learning in encounters with dioramas. Journal of Museum Education, 33(2), 153-164. doi: 10.1080/10598650.2008.11510596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2008.11510596
Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rogoff, B. (1995) Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In James Wertsch, Pablo del Rio and Amelia Alvarez (eds.) Sociocultural Studies of Mind. (pp. 139-164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008
Rozin, E. (2000). The role of flavor in the meal and the culture. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Dimensions Of The Meal: Science, Culture, Business, Art. (p. 134-142). Maryland: Aspen Publishers Inc.
Sullivan, S. (2002). Pragmatist feminism as ecological ontology: Reflections on Living across and through skin. Hypatia, 17(4), 201-217. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01081.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01081.x
Sund, L., Quennerstedt, M., & Öhman, M. (2019). The embodied social studies classroom – Repositioning the body in the social sciences in school. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1569350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1569350
Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Retrieved from: https://publikationer.vr.se/en/product/good-research-practice/
Tull, A. (2018). Food and Cooking Skills Education: Why teach people how to cook?. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315313894
Warde, A. (2016). The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wickman, P-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615756
Wickman, P-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325-344. doi: 10.1002/sce.10129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10129
Wickman, P-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601-623. doi: 10.1002/sce.10036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036
Wolfson, J. A., Bostic, S., Lahne, J., Morgan, C., Henley, S. C., Harvey, J., & Trubek, A. (2017). A comprehensive approach to understanding cooking behavior: Implications for research and practice. British Food Journal, 119(5), 1147-1158. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0438
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Östman, L. & Almqvist, J. (2011). What do values and Norms Have to Do with Scientific Literacy? In: Cedric Linder, Leif Östman, Douglas A. Roberts, Per-Olof Wickman, Gaalen Erickson & Allan MacKinnon (eds.) Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy. (pp. 160-175). London: Routledge.