Being in motion through an aesthetic working process

Main Article Content

Ann-Mari Edström
Björn Wangen

Abstract

The article reports the results of an empirical investigation into movement viewed as a quality of an aesthetic working process. Any process presupposes movement - there is no process if one stands still. At times, movement is deliberately provoked by artists wanting to view their work from a different perspective. This was the approach applied in the first-year course of an art teacher’s program in Sweden, where movement was provoked through shifts of media (cardboard, sketching, Minecraft) during a four-week working process. The assignment was to work with a 3D shape through these media. The students' process journals (containing writings and photography) constitute the material for the study. The results are visualized on an individual level as movement patterns and five characteristic patterns are discerned. Movement within and between media are visualized collectively, showing not only how media shifts stimulate movement but also how the students themselves can provoke movement within a medium. Sketching shows the most movement, typically triggered by the students themselves when they get bored by the repetitiveness of multiple sketching. Minecraft encourages the least amount of movement, which is discussed in relation to preconceptions embedded in the software design. The study relates to a phenomenographic approach.

Article Details

How to Cite
Edström, A.-M., & Wangen, B. (2020). Being in motion through an aesthetic working process. Educare - Vetenskapliga Skrifter, (1), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.1.7
Section
Articles

References

Akama, Y., Pink, S. & Sumartojo, S. (2018). Uncertainty and possibility. New approaches to future making in design anthropology. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350002722
Austerlitz, N., Blythman, M., Grove-White, A., Jones, B. A., Jones, C. A., Morgan, S. J., Orr, S., Shreeve, A., & Vaughan, S. (2008). Mind the gap: expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education. In: L. Drew (ed.), The Student Experience in Art and De-sign Higher Education: Drivers for Change (125-48). Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates Ltd.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and mean-ing. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Edström, A-M. (2008a). Learning in Visual Art Practice. Doctoral thesis. Lund University, Dept of Education.
Edström, A-M. (2008b). To rest assured: A study of artistic development. International Journal of Education and the Arts 9(3), 1-26. http://ijea.org/v9n3/
Edström, A-M. (2015). Exploring intentional instability as a quality of a learning environment. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 13(2), 117-34. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.13.2.117_1
Biesta, G. (2014). The Beautiful Risk of Education. Paradigm Publishers: Boulder, CO. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635866
Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). University of Learning. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
Callaghan, N. (2016). Investigating the role of Minecraft in educational learning environments. Educational Media International 53(4), 244-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1254877
Cirkus Cirkör (2016-06-07). http://cirkor.se/content/lindans-ekvilibrism
Danvers, J. (2003). Towards a radical pedagogy: Provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design. International Journal of Art & Design Education 22(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00338
Johansson, B., Marton, F., & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as change between qualitatively different conceptions. In: West, L. H. T. & Pines, A. L. (ed.) Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change (233-57). Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
Kindon, S L., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. (2007). Toward a Participatory Ethics. In: Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods : Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge. 2007 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671
Law, J. (2004). After method. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141
Linder, C., & Marshall, D. (2003). Reflection and phenomenography: Towards theoretical and educational development possibilities. Learning and Instruction 13, 271-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00002-6
Manovich, L. (2013). Media after software. Journal of Visual Culture 12(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412912470237
Manovich, L. (2014). Software is the message. Journal of Visual Culture 13(1), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412913509459
Marton, F. (1995). Cognosco ergo sum. Nordisk Pedagogik (Journal of Nordic Educational Research), 15(3), 165-80.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum and associ-ates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690
Marton, F., Dahlgren, L-O., Svensson, L., & Säljö, R. (1977/1996). Inlärning och omvärldsupp-fattning (Learning and conceptions of the world around us). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell Förlag.
Nyrnes, A. (2012) Kunnskapstopologi. In: Johansen, A. (ed.). Kunnskapens språk: skrivearbeid som forskningsmetode (31-48). Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press.
Nyrnes, A. (2013). The series – serial work in artistic research and in the didactics of the arts. InFormation 2(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.7577/if.v2i1.612
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: prin-ciples and practice. London: SAGE.
Ruppert, E. (2016). A baroque sensibility for big data visualisations. In: Law, J. (ed.). Modes of Knowing. Resources from the Baroque (136-64). Manchester: Mattering Press. https://doi.org/10.28938/9780993144998
Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. Diss. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 19. Gothenburg University: Dept. of Education.
Svensson, L. (1984). Människobilden i INOM-gruppens forskning: Den lärande människan (The concep-tion of man in the research of the INOM-group: The learning man). Rapport nr 3. Gothenburg Uni-versity: Dept. of Education.
Svensson, L. (1986). Three approaches to descriptive research. In: Ashworth, P. D (ed.) Qualita-tive Research in Psychology (23-46). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development 16(2), 159-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160204
Svensson, L. (2005). Issues of methodology: Contextual analysis. Paper, EERA post graduate and new researcher’s pre-conference, Dublin 5-6 Sept. 2005.
Svensson, L. (2016). Towards an integration of research on teaching and learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60(3), 272-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1120233
Swedish Research Council (2017). Good research practice. https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html
Tobin, S. (2015). Cocktail cabinets: A critique of digital and ludic essentialism. Analog Game Studies 2(1). http://analoggamestudies.org/2015/01/cocktail-cabinets/