Vikten av ett nationellt professionsspråk för teori- och praktikutveckling i svensk högre utbildning Exemplet forskning om respons på studenters skriftliga och muntliga framställning

Main Article Content

Anna Kristina Malmbjer
Cecilia Olsson Jers
Anna Wärnsby


To compile empirical research published in Swedish about instructor feedback on student written and oral production in Swedish higher education, we have conducted a systematic survey of recent publications (2010-2020) in seven Swedish academic peer-reviewed journals with educational foci. The results of this survey were surprising: during the last ten years, only two studies in Swedish investigating instructor feedback on student writing were published. We found no studies on instructor feedback on student oral production. Moreover, these studies defined the concept of feedback vaguely and used it inconsistently.  Not only is the fact that there are so few studies in Swedish on feedback in higher education remarkable, but the inconsistent use of the concept also makes theoretical and pedagogical development difficult. Based on these findings and, to a degree, contrary to the current policies encouraging international publication, we argue that more research publication should also be encouraged in Swedish on Swedish higher education for higher education practitioners.

Article Details

How to Cite
Malmbjer, A. K., Olsson Jers, C., & Wärnsby, A. (2022). Vikten av ett nationellt professionsspråk för teori- och praktikutveckling i svensk högre utbildning: Exemplet forskning om respons på studenters skriftliga och muntliga framställning. Educare, (3), 62–74.
Position Papers


Airey, J. (2011). The disciplinary literacy discussion matrix: A heuristic tool for initiating collaboration in higher education. Across the disciplines, 8(3) Unpaginated. DOI:

Airey J., Larsson J. (2018). Developing Students’ Disciplinary Literacy? The Case of University Physics. In: Tang KS., Danielsson K. (eds), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, ss. 357-376. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_21 DOI:

Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2008). Bilingual scientific literacy? The use of English in Swedish university science programmes. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 145–161. DOI:

Anson, I. & Anson, C. (2017). Assessing Peer and Instructor Response to Writing: A Corpus Analysis from an Expert Survey. Assessing Writing, 33(1), ss.12-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001 DOI:

Beck, S. (2006). Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in the Teaching and Learning of Writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), ss. 413–460.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, ss.5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 DOI:

Bordons, M. & Gómez, I. (2004). Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view. Serials The Journal for the Serials Community, 17(2), ss 189-195. DOI: 10.1629/17189 DOI:

Carless, D. & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), ss. 1315-1325. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 DOI:

Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2019). Unpacking the Lore on Multilingual Scholars Publishing in English: A Discussion Paper. Publications, 7(2), ss. 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/publications7020027 DOI:

Curry, M. J. & Lillis, T. (2013). Introduction to the Thematic issue: participating in academic publishing – consequences of linguistic policies and practices. Language Policy, 12(3), ss. 209-213. DOI: 10.1007/s10993-013-9286-7 DOI:

Curry, M. J. & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual Scholars and the Imperative to Publish in English: Negotiating Interests, Demands, and Rewards. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), 38(4), ss. 663-668. DOI: 10.2307/3588284 DOI:

Di Bitetti, M. & Ferreras, J. (2017). Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio, 45(6), ss. 121-127. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7 DOI:

Dysthe, O., Hertzberg, F. & Løkensgard Hoel, T. (2011). Skriva för att lära. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Ekholm, D. (2012). Handledning av examensarbeten som lärande i the zone of proximal development. Högre utbildning, 2(2), ss. 67–78.

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), ss. 70-120. DOI: 10.3102/0034654312474350 DOI:

Flowerdew, J. (2015). Some thoughts on English for Research Purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Language Teaching, 48(2), ss. 250-262. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444812000523 DOI:

Gibbons, P. (2006). Stärk språket, stärk lärandet: språk- och kunskapsutvecklande arbetssätt för och med andraspråkselever i klassrummet. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.

Frans, G., Josephson, O., Godenhjelm, S., Londen, M., Östman, J.-O., Kristinsson, A. P., Bernhardsson, H., Røyneland, U., Kristoffersen, G., Kristiansen, M., Thørgersen, J., Salö, L. (2014). Hvor parallelt : Om parallellspråkighet på Nordens universitet. DOI:

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), ss. 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487 DOI:

Hållsten, S. (2017). Stöttning av skrivande i ett digitalt diskussionsforum: Kan den digitala lärplattformens kursdesign utvecklas genrepedagogiskt? Högre utbildning, 7(1). DOI: 10.23865/hu.v7.904 DOI:

Jepson, D. (2010). The importance of national language as a level of discourse within individuals’ theorising of leadership – A qualitative study of German and English employees. Leadership 6(4), ss. 425-455. DOI: 10.1177/1742715010379311 DOI:

Josephson, O. 23 November 2020. Professor: Varför tystas svenskspråkig forskning? Kulturdebatt, Svenska Dagbladet. Hämtad 19 februari 2021:

Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T. C. E., Rozkosz, E. A., Zuccala, A. A., Bruun, K., Eskola, O., Istenič Starčič, A., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G. (2020). Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven-country European study. JASIST, 71(11), ss. 1371-1385. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24336 DOI:

Kuteeva, M. (2015). Academic English as ‘nobody’s land’. The research and publishing practices of Swedish academics. I Pló Alastroé, R. & Pérez-Llantada, C., eds., English as a Language and Research Language. Berlin: de Gruyter. ss. 261–280. DOI: 10.1515/9781614516378-014 DOI:

Kuteeva, M. & McGrath, L. (2014). Taming Tyrannosaurus rex: English use in the research and publication practices of humanities scholars in Sweden. Multilingua, 33(3–4), ss. 365–387 DOI: 10.1515/multi-2014-0017 DOI:

López-Pastor, V. Pintor, P. Muros, B. & Webb, G. (2013). Formative assessment strategies and their effect on student performance and on tutor workload. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(2), ss.163-180. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2011.644780 DOI:

López-Pastor, V. & Sicilias-Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the futures. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), ss.77-97. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535 DOI:

Løkengard Hoel, T. (2010). Skriva på universitet och högskolor: En bok för lärare och studenter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

McLean, A. Bond, C. & Nicholson, H. (2015). An anatomy of feedback: A phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students’ perceptions of feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), ss. 921-932. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.855718 DOI:

Mickwitz, Å. (2017). ”Mer handledning och feedback hade varit bra” En studie om studenternas självreglering på en kurs i skrivande enligt modellen för självständigt lärande. Högre utbildning, 7(1). DOI: 10.23865/hu.v7.915 DOI:

Mirador, J. (2014) Moves, Intentions and the Language of Feedback Commentaries in Education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), ss. 39-53. DOI: 10.17509/IJAL.V4I1.599 DOI:

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), ss. 501-517. DOI: 10.1080/02602931003786559 DOI:

Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), ss. 199–218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090 DOI:

Nordiska ministerrådet. 2007. Deklaration om nordisk språkpolitik 2006. Köpenham: Nordiska ministerrådet. Hämtad 19 februari 2021:

Olsson Jers, C. and Wärnsby, A. (2017). Assessment of situated orality: the role of reflection and revision in appropriation and transformation of research ethos. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1): s.1-12. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1383356 DOI:

Poomkottayil, D., Bornstein, M.M. & Sendi, P. (2011). Lost in translation: The impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scientific dental literature. Swiss Medical Weekly, 141:w13148. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2011.13148 DOI:

Pölönen, J., Syrjämäki, S., Nygård, A.-J. and Hammarfelt, B. (2021), Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish platform. Learned Publishing, 34, pp. 585-592. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1405 DOI:

Rosiek, J. (2003) Emotional Scaffolding: An Exploration of the Teacher Knowledge at the Intersection of Student Emotion and the Subject Matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), ss. 399-412. DOI: 10.1177/002248710325089 DOI:

Salö, L. 3 september 2020. Fjuttig engelska eller mossig svenska? Tidningen Curie. Hämtad 19 februari 2021:

Salö, L. (2016). Languages and linguistic exchanges in Swedish academia: practices, processes, and globalizing markets. Diss. (sammanfattning). Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.

Salö, L. (2010). Engelska eller Svenska?. En kartläggning av språksituationen inom högre utbildning och forskning. Institution för språk och folkminne, Språkrådet.

SFS 1992: 1434 Högskolelagen.

SFS 1993:100 Högskoleförordningen.

SFS 2009:600 Språklagen.

Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1). ss. 153-189. DOI:

Swales, J. M. (1997). English as Tyrannosaurus rex. World Englishes 16(3). ss. 373-382 DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00071 DOI:

Teleman, U. och Westman, M. (1997). Behöver vi en nationell språkpolitik? Språkvård, 2, ss. 5-16.

Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics 51, ss. 335–346. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010549719484 DOI:

Ädel, A. (2017). Remember that your reader cannot read your mind: Problem/solution-oriented metadiscourse in teacher feedback on student writing. English for Specific Purposes, 45, ss. 54-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.002 DOI: