Lärares iscensättning av stöttning vid nyanlända elevers digitala textproduktion
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previous studies describe scaffolding as fundamental for newly arrived students to understand and create texts. In this article, scaffolding students’ multilingual palette (the full range of multilingual resources) is vital for their meaning-making. This study aims to make linguistic diversity visible when scaffolding newly arrived students during digital text activities in narrative and retelling text in Swedish as a second language. The following research question guides the study: How do scaffolding processes during digital text activities contribute to opportunities for newly arrived students with varying backgrounds and experiences of the Swedish language to use their multilingual palettes? The data consists of ethnographic fieldwork in three primary schools (year 3), focusing on scaffolding during nine newly arrived students’ text activities. Through an iterative analysis process, scaffolding emerged to have the following functions: 1) to promote multilingualism, 2) to develop textual competence, 3) to support student space. Scaffolding of newly arrived students who did not yet speak Swedish contributed to all students being able to create text within the text types. However, the scaffolding did not support their use of multilingual resources during individual text activities. For students to develop multilingual resources, scaffolding must focus on translanguaging and non-verbal means of expression, even during individual activities. For this, using digital technology is advantageous.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-04-08
Published 2022-05-13
References
Anderson, J., Chung, Y. C., & Macleroy, V. (2018). Creative and critical approaches to language learning and digital technology: findings from a multilingual digital storytelling project. Language and Education, 32(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1430151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1430151
Atkinson, P. (2015). For Ethnography. Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 53). London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.190472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.190472
Axelsson, M. (2019). Svenska som andraspråk och flerspråkighet. I C. Liberg & J. S. Smidt (Eds.), Att bli lärare i svenska (s. 143–158). Stockholm: Liber.
Bjønness, B., & Dankert Kolstø, S. (2015). Scaffolding open inquiry: How a teacher provides students with structure and space. Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(3), 223–237. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/17e32740e0504e08832b609ea1916fa2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.878
Bunar, N. (2021). Inledning. I N. Bunar (Red.), Inkludering och skolframgång för nyanlända elever (pp. 11–43). Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). Focus on Multilingualism: A Study of Trilingual Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4781.2011.01206.X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01206.x
Christie, F. (2005). Language Education in the Primary Years. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press.
Colliander, H., & Fejes, A. (2021). The re-emergence of Suggestopedia: teaching a second language to adult migrants in Sweden. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767643
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies ”: New literacies , new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the Bilingual Classroom: A Pedagogy for Learning and Teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: bilingual children in the crossfire . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773
Daniel, S. M., Martin-Beltrán, M., Peercy, M. M., & Silverman, R. (2016). Moving Beyond Yes or No: Shifting From Over-Scaffolding to Contingent Scaffolding in Literacy Instruction With Emergent Bilingual Students. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.213
Davies, C. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography : a guide to researching selves and others (second). London: Routledge.
Författare. (2021).
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2019). Translanguaging and Literacies. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.286
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging in Education: Principles, Implications and Challenges. In Translanguaging (pp. 119–135). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_8
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom : students, teachers and researchers. London: Continuum.
Gibbons, P. (2016). Stärk språket, stärk lärandet: språk- och kunskapsutvecklande arbetssätt för och med andraspråkselever i klassrummet. Stockholm: Hallgren & Fallgren.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography : principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect , 20(1), 6–30.
Hedman, C., & Magnusson, U. (2017). Samtal om lärobokstext på två språk. Nordand, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2535-3381-2017-01-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-3381-2017-01-03
Hedman, C., & Magnusson, U. (2020). Student ambivalence toward second language education in three Swedish upper secondary schools. Linguistics and Education, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100767
Hellspong, L., & Ledin, P. (1997). Vägar genom texten: handbok i brukstextanalys. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Josephson, O., Melin, L., & Oliv, T. (1990). Elevtext - Analyser av skoluppsatser från åk 1 till åk 9. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kock, N. (2003). Action research: Lessons learned from a multi-iteration study of computer-mediated communication in groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2003.813164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2003.813164
Ladegaard, U. (2015). När tvåspråkiga barn ger betydelsen form. I H. P. Laursen (Red.), Litteracitet och språklig mångfald (pp. 157–172). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lantz-Andersson, A., & Säljö, R. (2014). Lärare i den uppkopplade skolan. Malmö: Gleerup.
Laursen, H. P. (2007). Intersprogsanalyse og andetsprogspædagogik. Köpenhamn: CVU København & Nordsjælland, uc2 , Københavns Kommune.
Lim, F. V. (2020). Designing learning with embodied teaching : perspectives from multimodality. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429353178
Lindberg, I. (2020). Samtal och interaktion i andraspråksforskning. I K. Hyltenstam & I. Lindberg (Eds.), Svenska som andraspråk - I forskning, undervisning och samhälle (pp. 481–518). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lotherington, H., & Rahemtula, F. (2017). We Speak Your Language. I H. Lotherington & C. Paige (Red.), Teaching Young Learners in a Superdiverse World (pp. 31–53). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626079-3
Magnusson, U. (2011). Skolspråk i utveckling: en- och flerspråkiga elevers bruk av grammatiska metaforer i senare skolår. [Doktorsavhandling, Göteborgs universitet].
Margolis, A. A. (2020). Zone of Proximal Development, Scaffolding and Teaching Practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160303
Martin-Beltrán, M., Guzman, N. L., & Chen, P.-J. J. J. (2017). “Let”s think about it together:’ how teachers differentiate discourse to mediate collaboration among linguistically diverse students. Language Awareness, 26(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1278221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1278221
Mousazadeh, Z., Hassaskhah, J., & Zafarghandi, A. M. (2018). The Effects of Computer Assisted Mediating Prompts on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 64–71. Retrieved from https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/4184/3324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.64
Norberg Brorsson, B. (2017). Varför är snö vit? Om språkande i naturvetenskap. I P. Lahdenperä & E. Sundgren (Red.), Nyanlända, interkulturalitet och flerspråkighet i klassrummet (s. 229–261). Stockholm: Liber.
Obondo, M., Lahdenperä, P., & Sandevärn, P. (2016). Interkulturell pedagogik i praktisk handling - utmaningar och möjligheter. I P. Lahdenperä & E. Sundgren (Red.), Skolans möte med nyanlända (pp. 182–206). Stockholm: Liber.
Olin-Scheller, C. (2006). Mellan Dante och Big Brother: En studie om gymnasieelevers textvärldar. [Doktorsavhandling, Karlstads universitet].
Otterup, T. (2018). Flerspråkighet - från hinder till resurs. I T. Otterup & G. Kästen-Ebeling (Red.), En god fortsättning - Nyanländas fortsatta väg i skola och samhälle (s. 123–139). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Pacheco, M. B., Smith, B. E., Deig, A., & Amgott, N. A. (2021). Scaffolding Multimodal Composition With Emergent Bilingual Students: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211010888, 53(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211010888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211010888
Paulus, T., Woodside, M., & Ziegler, M. (2008). Extending the Conversation: Qualitative Research as Dialogic Collaborative Process . Qualitative Report., 13(2), 226–243.
Reynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2018). Toward Contingency in Scaffolding Reading Comprehension: Next Steps for Research. Reading Research Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.200
Rubin, M. (2019). Språkliga redskap - Språklig beredskap: en praktiknära studie om elevers ämnesspråkliga deltagande i ljuset av inkluderande undervisning. [Avhandling, Malmö universitet].
Schmidt, C. (2021). Läsa och skriva i alla ämnen . Stockholm. Hämtad från https://larportalen.skolverket.se/LarportalenAPI/api-v2/document/path/larportalen/material/inriktningar/5-las-skriv/Grundskola/002-Lasa-o-skriva/del_01/1. Uppdraget och texterna.pdf
Selander, S., & Rostvall, A. L. (2010). Design för lärende. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Skolverket. (2019). Kursplan - Svenska som andraspråk (Grundskolan). Stockholm: Skolverket. Hämtad från https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/grundskolan/laroplan-och-kursplaner-for-grundskolan/laroplan-lgr11-for-grundskolan-samt-for-forskoleklassen-och-fritidshemmet?url=1530314731%2Fcompulsorycw%2Fjsp%2Fsubject.htm%3FsubjectCode%3DGRGRSVA01%26tos%3Dgr%26p
Skolverket. (2021). Att göra extra anpassningar och ge särskilt stöd i grundskole- och gymnasieutbildning - Skolverket. Hämtad från https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/inspiration-och-stod-i-arbetet/stod-i-arbetet/att-gora-extra-anpassningar-och-ge-sarskilt-stod-i-grundskole--och-gymnasieutbildning
Skoog, M. (2012). Skriftspråkande i förskoleklass och årskurs 1. [Avhandling, Örebro universitet].
Sofkova Hashemi, S., Wennås Brante, E., Cederlund, K., Godhe, A.-L., Magnusson, P., Stenliden, L., … Anna, Å. (2020). Digitala textkompetenser och undervisning. En metatolkande syntes av forskningsstudier om texter, information och multimodalitet i skolan. In M. Johansson, B.-G. Martinsson, & S. Parmenius Svärd (Red.), Trettonde konferensen i svenska med didaktisk inriktning. Bildning, utbildning, fortbildning. Linköping 22-23 november 2018. (s. 270–286). Linköping: Nationella nätverket för svenska med didaktisk inriktning.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Säljö, R. (2014). Lärande i praktiken : ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Studentlitteratur.
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Thorstensson Dávila, L. (2017). Newly arrived immigrant youth in Sweden negotiate identity, language & literacy. System, 67, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.001
Valencia, S. W., & Wixson, K. K. (2013). CCSS-ELA: Suggestions and Cautions for Implementing the Reading Standards. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 181–185. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24573650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1207
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: awareness, autonomy and authenticity (Applied Linguistics and Language Study Series). London: Longman.
van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based Teaching, Autonomy and Identity. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt42.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/illt42.0
Vygotskiĭ, L. S. (Lev S. (1978). Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes. In V. M. Cole, John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. S. (Eds.) (Eds.) (p. 159). Harvard University Press.
Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: a pedagogy of promise. San Francisco: WestEd.
Wedin, Å. (2011). Utveckling av tal och skriftspråk hos andraspråkselever i skolans tidigare år. DidaktiskTidskrift, 20(2), 95–118. Hämtad från http://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:430049/FULLTEXT03.pdf
Winlund, A., Lyngfelt, A., & Wengelin, Å. (2019). Nyanlända elevers litteracitetspraktiker i skolan. Educare - Vetenskapliga Skrifter, (1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2017.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2017.1.4
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89−100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260