Doctoral Supervision: A Reflection Matrix for Process and Progress

Main Article Content

Alberto Chrysoulakis

Abstract


Successful doctoral studies rely heavily on the quality of supervision, particularly the relationship between supervisor and doctoral student. This relationship influences both the doctoral process and the final product—the completed thesis. Prior research indicates that supervisory alliances play a critical role in doctoral completion, with insufficient supervisor support often cited as a key factor in student attrition. To assist supervisors, especially those new to the role, this paper proposes a structured yet flexible reflective checklist. Grounded in two systematic reviews, the checklist combines five key supervisory dimensions—relationship, domain/research knowledge, pedagogical competencies, functional aspects, and methodological understanding—with both external (e.g., departmental structures, financial opportunities) and internal (e.g., motivation, academic identity) factors affecting doctoral progression. This framework encourages supervisors to continually examine and refine their practices, thereby fostering an environment that supports effective doctoral training. Ultimately, the reflective checklist serves as a customizable tool to prompt ongoing awareness, adaptation, and development in supervisory practice.


Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Alberto Chrysoulakis, Department of Criminology, Malmö University

Alberto Chrysoulakis at Malmö University

References

Christie, M., & Jurado, R. G. (2013). Using communicative action theory to analyse relationships between supervisors and PhD students in a technical university in Sweden. Högre utbildning, 3(3), 187-197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v3.800

Haley, A., Holmqvist, M. & Johansson, K. (2024). Supervisors’ competences from doctoral students’ perspectives – a systematic review. Educational Review, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2024.2306938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2024.2306938

Högskoleverket [Swedish National Agency for Higher Education] (2012). Orsaker till att doktoranderlämnar forskarutbildningen utan examen – en uppföljning av nybörjarna på forskarnivå läsåren 1999/2000 och 2000/01. Rapport 2012:1 R. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.

Krásničan, V., Gaižauskaitė, I., Bülow, W., Dlabolova, D.H. & Bjelobaba, S. (2024). Transition from Academic Integrity to Research Integrity: The Use of Checklists in the Supervision of Master and Doctoral Students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22, 149-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09498-0

Lindén, J. (2020a). “Professional approach”. In Doctoral Supervision in theory and practice, pp. 67-84. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lindén, J. (2020b). ”Supervision problems”. In Doctoral Supervision in theory and practice, pp. 85-113. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Sverdlik, A., Hall, N.C, McAlpine, L. & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4113